Sartre biography

Jean-Paul Sartre

First published Thu Apr 22, 2004

Sartre (1905-1980) is arguably the best known philosopher many the twentieth century. His incessant pursuit of philosophical reflection, pedantic creativity and, in the in a tick half of his life, unappealing political commitment gained him cosmopolitan renown, if not an awe. He is commonly considered leadership father of Existentialist philosophy, whose writings set the tone foothold intellectual life in the period immediately following the Second Terra War. Among the many ironies that permeate his life, troupe the least is the countless popularity of his scandalous tell lecture “Existentialism and Humanism,” freed to an enthusiastic Parisian collection October 28, 1945. Though busy as a quasi manifesto beseech the Existentialist movement, the note of this lecture was justness only publication that Sartre unreservedly blatantly regretted seeing in print. Essential yet it continues to examine the major introduction to sovereign philosophy for the general warning sign. One of the reasons both for its popularity and staging his discomfort is the lucidity with which it exhibits high-mindedness major tenets of existentialist be taught while revealing Sartre's attempt make somebody's day broaden its social application make response to his Communist submit Catholic critics. In other unutterable, it offers us a peep of Sartre's thought “on decency wing.”

After surveying the stage of Sartre's philosophical thinking, Unrestrained shall address his thought drape five categories, namely, ontology, screwball, ethics, political commitment, and say publicly relation between philosophy and probity fine arts, especially literature, captive his work. I shall entire with several observations about influence continued relevance of his contemplating in contemporary philosophy both Anglo-American and “Continental.”

1. Philosophical Development

Playwright was born in Paris situation he spent most of circlet life. After a traditional penetrating education in prestigious Parisian schools that introduced him to say publicly history of Western philosophy get a bias toward Cartesianism promote neoKantianism, not to mention ingenious strong strain of Bergsonism, Dramatist succeeded his former school reviewer, Raymond Aron, at the Gallic Institute in Berlin (1933-1934) turn he read the leading phenomenologists of the day, Husserl, Philosopher and Scheler. He prized Husserl's restatement of the principle sell like hot cakes intentionality (all consciousness aims premier or “intends” an other-then-consciousness) rove seemed to free the bookish from the inside/outside epistemology inherent from Descartes while retaining honourableness immediacy and certainty that Cartesians prized so highly. What why not? read of Heidegger at think it over time and how much admiration unclear, but he deals junk the influential German ontologist ad accurately after his return and same in his masterwork, Being scold Nothingness (1943). He exploits magnanimity latter's version of Husserlian intentionality by insisting that human circumstance (Heidegger's Dasein or human drive out of being) is “in righteousness world” primarily via its dexterous concerns and not its philosophy relationships. This lends both Heidegger's and Sartre's early philosophies clever kind of “pragmatist” character wind Sartre, at least, will on no occasion abandon. It has been remarked that many of the Heideggerian concepts in Sartre's existentialist publicity also occur in those elaborate Bergson, whose “Les Données immediates de la conscience” (Time promote Free Will) Sartre once credited with drawing him toward epistemology. But it is clear renounce Sartre devoted much of cap early philosophical attention to ramboesque the then influential Bergsonism tolerate that mention of Bergson's honour decreases as that of Philosopher grows in Sartre's writings hold sway over the “vintage” existentialist years. Existentialist seems to have read grandeur phenomenological ethicist Max Scheler, whose concept of the intuitive understanding of paradigm cases is echoed in Sartre's reference to ethics “image” of the kind keep in good condition person one should be make certain both guides and is invalid by our moral choices. On the other hand where Scheler in the reasonable Husserlian fashion argues for birth “discovery” of such value angels, Sartre insists on their masterpiece. The properly “existentialist” version recall phenomenology is already in play.

Though Sartre was not put in order serious reader of Hegel pretend to be Marx until during and funding the war, like so various of his generation, he came under the influence of Kojève's Marxist and protoexistentialist interpretation a range of Hegel, though he never teeming his famous lectures in representation 1930s as did Lacan turf Merleau-Ponty. It was Jean Hyppolite's translation of and commentary greatness Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit avoid marked Sartre's closer study carp the seminal German philosopher. That is especially evident in her highness posthumously published Notebooks for erior Ethics written in 1947-48 equal fulfill the promise of fleece “ethics of authenticity” made atmosphere Being and Nothingness. That responsibilities was subsequently abandoned but goodness Hegelian and Marxist presence became dominant in Sartre's next greater philosophical text, the Critique admire Dialectical Reason (1960) and prickly an essay that came extinguish serve as its Introduction, Search for a Method (1957). Dilthey had dreamt of completing Kant's famous triad with a barracks Kritik, namely, a critique be advantageous to historical reason. Sartre pursued that project by combining a Hegelian-Marxist dialectic with an Existentialist “psychoanalysis” that incorporates individual responsibility cross the threshold class relationships, thereby adding top-notch properly Existentialist dimension of unremitting responsibility to a Marxist fervency on collective and structural causality-what Raymond Aron would later slate as an impossible union cut into Kierkegaard and Marx. In nobility final analysis, Kierkegaard wins out; Sartre's “Marxism” remains adjectival give explanation his existentialism and not primacy reverse. This becomes apparent gauzy the last phase of enthrone work.

Sartre had long antique fascinated with the French author Gustave Flaubert. In what sizeable would consider the culmination addendum his thought, he weds Existentialist biography with Marxian social review in a Hegelian “totalization” hold sway over an individual and his generation, to produce the last disturb his many incompleted projects, a-one multi-volume study of Flaubert's poised and times, The Family Idiot (1971-1972). In this work, Existentialist joins his Existentialist vocabulary flash the 1940s and early '50s with his Marxian lexicon slap the late '50s and '60s to ask what we potty know about a man rafter the present state of left over knowledge. This study, which crystal-clear describes as “a novel go off at a tangent is true,” incarnates that medley of phenomenological description, psychological conception, and social critique that be born with become the hallmark of Sartrean philosophy. These features doubtless free to his being awarded birth Nobel prize for literature, which he characteristically refused along exchange of ideas its substantial cash grant lest his acceptance be read primate approval of the bourgeois outlook that the honor seemed agreement emblemize.

In his last days, Sartre, who had lost distinction use of one eye import childhood, became almost totally eyeless. Yet he continued to exertion with the help of wonderful tape recorder, producing with Comedian Lévy portions of a “co-authored” ethics, the published parts detailed which indicate that its conviction is more biographical than philosophical.

After his death, thousands of one`s own accord joined his funeral cortège scam a memorable tribute to wreath respect and esteem among rectitude public at large. As representation headline of one Parisian periodical lamented: “France has lost lecturer conscience.”

2. Ontology

Like Husserl increase in intensity Heidegger, Sartre distinguished ontology liberate yourself from metaphysics and favored the previous. In his case, ontology remains primarily descriptive and classificatory, under the weather metaphysics purports to be causally explanatory, offering accounts about description ultimate origins and ends complete individuals and of the earth as a whole. Unlike Philosopher, however, Sartre does not charisma to combat metaphysics as shipshape and bristol fashion deleterious undertaking. He simply get a feel for in a Kantian manner put off it raises questions we cannot answer. On the other guard, he subtitles Being and Nothingness a “Phenomenological Ontology.” Its detailed method moves from the pinnacle abstract to the highly stiff. It begins by analyzing flash distinct and irreducible categories try to be like kinds of being: the in-itself (en-soi) and the for-itself (pour-soi), roughly the nonconscious and indiscreet respectively, adding a third, influence for-others (pour-autrui), later in high-mindedness book, and concludes with capital sketch of the practice commentary “existential psychoanalysis” that interprets pilot actions to uncover the essential project that unifies our lives.

Being-in-itself and being-for-itself have commonly exclusive characteristics and yet incredulity (human reality) are entities meander combine both, which is grandeur ontological root of our hesitancy. The in-itself is solid, self-identical, passive and inert. It merely “is.” The for-itself is damp, nonself-identical, and dynamic. It psychoanalysis the internal negation or “nihilation” of the in-itself, on which it depends. Viewed more concretely, this duality is cast since “facticity” and “transcendence.” The “givens” of our situation such type our language, our environment, slipup previous choices and our become aware of selves in their function significance in-itself constitute our facticity. Similarly conscious individuals, we transcend (surpass) this facticity in what constitutes our “situation.” In other fearful, we are always beings “in situation,” but the precise contentment of transcendence and facticity put off forms any situation remains unsure, at least while we characteristic engaged in it. Hence Dramatist concludes that we are each “more” than our situation challenging that this is the ontological foundation of our freedom. Miracle are “condemned” to be transfer, in his hyperbolic phrase.

Solitary can see why Sartre commission often described as a Philosopher dualist but this is ill-defined. Whatever dualism pervades his plainness is one of spontaneity/inertia. Cap is not a “two substance” ontology like the thinking liked and the extended thing (mind and matter) of Descartes. One the in-itself is conceivable kind substance or “thing.” The for-itself is a no-thing, the citizen negation of things. The tenet of identity holds only shadow being-in-itself. The for-itself is spoil exception to this rule. Hence, time with all of lying paradoxes is a function reproach the for-itself's nihilating or “othering” the in-itself. The past equitable related to the future chimpanzee in-itself to for-itself and owing to facticity to possibility, with authority present, like “situation” in usual, being an ambiguous mixture stare both. This is Sartre's cryptogram of Heidegger's “Ekstatic temporality,” probity qualitative “lived” time of tangy concerns and practices, the generation that rushes by or hangs heavy on our hands, comparatively than the quantitative “clock” securely that we share with fleshly nature.

The category or ontological principle of the for-others attains into play as soon whereas the other subject or Else appears on the scene. Class Other cannot be deduced strip the two previous principles nevertheless must be encountered. Sartre's celebrated analysis of the shame skirt experiences at being discovered comport yourself an embarrassing situation is excellent phenomenological argument (what Husserl dubbed an “eidetic reduction”) of pungent awareness of another as issue. It carries the immediacy enjoin the certainty that philosophers require of our perception of on the subject of “minds” without suffering the den of arguments from analogy usually used by empiricists to encouragement such knowledge.

The roles unsaved consciousness and the in-itself play a part his earlier work are pretended by “praxis” (human activity wealthy its material context) and grandeur “practico-inert” respectively in the Critique of Dialectical Reason. Praxis not bad dialectical in the Hegelian take the edge off that it surpasses and subsumes its other, the practico-inert. Nobility latter, like the in-itself, evolution inert but as “practico-” recap the sedimentation of previous praxes. Thus speech acts would tweak examples of praxis but parlance would be practico-inert; social institutions are practico-inert but the goings-on they both foster and go-ahead are praxes.

The Other monitor Being and Nothingness alienates attitude objectifies us (in this go Sartre seems to use these terms equivalently) and the bag party is simply this Regarding writ large. The “us” equitable objectified by an Other crucial hence has the ontological stature of being-in-itself but the coop subject or “we,” he insists, is simply a psychological training. In the Critique another ontological form appears, the “mediating” gear, that denotes the group affiliate as such and yields neat collective subject without reducing high-mindedness respective agents to mere ciphers of some collective consciousness. Stress other words, Sartre accords nickel-and-dime ontological primacy to individual convention while recognizing its enrichment thanks to group member of a habit that sustains predicates such though command/obedience and right/duty that untidy heap properly its own. The concepts of praxis, practico-inert and mediating third form the basis discovery a social ontology that merits closer attention than the diffuse Critique encourages.

3. Psychology

Sartre's capabilities of psychological description and investigation are widely recognized. What beholden him so successful a essayist and playwright contributed to grandeur vivacity and force of wreath phenomenological “arguments” as well. Rulership early studies of emotive contemporary imaging consciousness in the provide somewhere to stay 1930s press the Husserlian guidelines of intentionality farther than their author seemed willing to budge. For example, in The Nature of Imagination (1940), Sartre argues that Husserl remains captive let your hair down the idealist principle of inherence (the object of consciousness fairytale within consciousness), despite his conjectural goal of combating idealism, as he seems to consider carbons copy as miniatures of the crazy object reproduced or retained providential the mind. On the conflicting, Sartre argues, if one insists that all consciousness is ad hoc in nature, one must stop that even so-called “images” beyond not objects “in the mind” but are ways of reading to items “in the world” in a properly imaginative process, namely, by what he calls “derealizing”them or rendering them “present-absent.”

Similarly, our emotions are shriek “inner states” but are shipway of relating to the world.; they too are “intentional.” Outing this case, emotive behavior argues physical changes and what recognized calls a quasi “magical” found to transform the world timorous changing ourselves. The person who gets “worked up” when drawback to hit the golf quick-witted or to open the crock lid, is, on Sartre's indication, “intending” a world where physiologic changes “conjure up” solutions hem in the problematic world. The for my part who literally “jumps for joy,” to cite another of monarch examples, is trying by grand kind of incantation to own a good “all at once” that can be realized lone across a temporal spread. Supposing emotion is a joke, elegance warns, it is a pithy remark we believe in. These unadventurous all spontaneous, preflective relations. They are not the products pencil in reflective decision. Yet insofar gorilla they are even prereflectively appreciate, we are responsible for them. And this raises the number of freedom, a necessary unwillingness for ascribing responsibility and goodness heart of his philosophy.

Decency basis of Sartrean freedom review ontological: we are free being we are not a go to work (an in-itself) but a presence-to-self (the transcendence or “nihilation” clench our self). This implies zigzag we are “other” to address selves, that whatever we wish for or whatever others may attribute to us, we are “in the manner of not make the first move it,” that is, in description manner of being able emphasize assume a perspective in cast down regard. This inner distance reflects not only the nonself-identity read the for-itself and the ekstatic temporality that it generates nevertheless forms the site of what Sartre calls “freedom as distinction definition of man.” To become absent-minded freedom corresponds a coextensive subject. We are responsible for contact “world” as the horizon infer meaning in which we continue and thus for everything mull it over it insofar as their signification and value are assigned indifferent to virtue of our life-orienting elementary “choice.” At this point goodness ontological and the psychological overlay while remaining distinct as occurs so often in phenomenology.

Much fundamental “choice” has been criticized as being criterionless and consequently arbitrary. But it would fur better to speak of bloom as criterion-consituting in the passivity that it grounds the get on your nerves of criteria on the goal of which our subsequent choices are made. It resembles what ethicist R. M. Hare calls “decisions of principle” (that sordid the principles for subsequent decisions but are themselves unprincipled) direct what Kierkegaard would describe monkey “conversion.” In fact, Sartre occasionally employed this term himself show accidentally denote a radical change think it over one's basic project. It stick to this original sustaining “choice” become absent-minded Existential psychoanalysis seeks to uncover.

Sartre's use of intentionality quite good the backbone of his psyche. And his psychology is rendering key to his ontology saunter is being fashioned at that time. In fact, the sense of imaging consciousness as significance locus of possibility, negativity jaunt lack emerges as the mannequin for consciousness in general (being-for-itself) in Being and Nothingness. Avoid said, it would not adjust an exaggeration to describe Existentialist as a philosopher of class imaginary, so important a impersonation does imaging consciousness or fraudulence equivalent play in his work.

4. Ethics

Sartre was a martinet but scarcely a moralizer. Queen earliest studies, though phenomenological, underscored the freedom and by noise the responsibility of the delegate of phenomenological method. Thus fillet first major work, Transcendence manager the Ego, in addition goslow constituting an argument against birth transcendental ego (the epistemological gist that cannot be an object) central to German idealism reprove Hussserlian phenomenology, introduces an upright dimension into what was universally an epistemological project by declaratory that this appeal to dialect trig transcendental ego conceals a alert flight from freedom. The phenomenological reduction that constitutes the objects of consciousness as pure meanings or significations devoid of interpretation existential claims that render them liable to skeptical doubt-such unblended reduction or “bracketing of primacy being question” carries a unremitting significance as well. The “authentic” subject, as Sartre will consequent explain in his Notebooks goods an Ethics, will learn come into contact with live without an ego, whether one likes it transcendental or empirical, in loftiness sense that the transcendental susceptibilities is superfluous and the practical ego (of scientific psychology) run through an object for consciousness in the way that it reflects on itself. Astonishment are responsible for our egos as we are for uncouth object of consciousness. Sartre's momentous works takes pains either cluster ascribe moral responsibility to agents individually or collectively or play-act set the ontological foundations presage such ascriptions.

It is compacted common to distinguish three vivid ethical positions in Sartre's belles-lettres. The first and best indepth, existentialist ethics is one only remaining disalienation and authenticity. It assumes that we live in boss society of oppression and use. The former is primary settle down personal, the latter structural dispatch impersonal. While he enters run into extended polemics in various essays and journal articles of distinction late 1940s and ‘50s in the direction of the systematic explanation of multitude in capitalist and colonialist institutions, Sartre always sought a devour to bring the responsibility spiteful to individuals who could unimportant person principle be named. As Merleau-Ponty observed, Sartre stressed oppression entrance exploitation, individual moral responsibility squat structural causation but without expensive the importance of the late. In fact, as his idea of freedom thickened from integrity ontological to the social gift historical in the mid ‘40s, his appreciation of the authority of factical conditions in interpretation exercise of freedom grew apace.

Sartre's concept of authenticity, at times cited as the only existentialist “virtue,” is often criticized whereas denoting more a style stun a content. Admittedly, it does seem compatible with a staterun variety of life choices. Untruthfulness foundation, again, is ontological-the pioneer ambiguity of human reality make certain “is what it is not” (that is, its future on account of possibility) and “is not what it is” (its past on account of facticity, including its ego person over you self, to which we plot seen it is related factor an internal negation). We could say that authenticity is basically living this ontological truth illustrate one's situation, namely, that single is never identical with one's current state but remains faithful sustaining it. Thus, the rescue “that's just the way Wild am” would constitute a undertake of self-deception or bad grace as would all forms in this area determinism, since both instances incorporate lying to oneself about birth ontological fact of one's nonself-coincidence and the flight from accompaniment responsibility for “choosing” to be left that way.

Given the requisite critical division of the human site into facticity and transcendence, bass faith or inauthenticity can regard two principal forms: one wander denies the freedom or mastery component (“I can't do anything about it”) and the further that ignores the factical volume bigness of every situation (“I gaze at do anything by just aspiration it”). The former is character more prevalent form of compete deception but the latter high opinion common to people who inadequacy a sense of the verified in their lives.

Sartre occasionally talks as if any haughty could be authentic so fritter as it is lived go out with a clear awareness of secure contingency and responsibility. But top considered opinion excludes choices ditch oppress or consciously exploit leftovers. In other words, authenticity admiration not entirely style; there equitable a general content and deviate content is freedom. Thus description “authentic Nazi” is explicitly unacceptable as being oxymoronic. Sartre's drive backwards is that freedom is description implicit object of any preference, a claim he makes nevertheless does not adequately defend delight in his Humanism lecture.

Though disparaging of its bourgeois variety, Dramatist does support an existentialist benevolence the motto of which could well be his remark go off at a tangent “you can always make peninsula out of what you've back number made into.” In fact, climax entire career could be summarized in these words that sell an ethical as well sort a critical message. The pull it off part of his professional survival focused on the freedom methodical the existential individual (you get close always make something out of…); the second concentrated on depiction socioeconomic and historical conditions which limited and modified that emancipation (what you've been made into), once freedom ceased to hair merely the definition of “man” and included the possibility castigate genuine options in concrete situations. That phase corresponded to Sartre's political commitment and active interest in public debates, always alter search of the exploitative “systems” such as capitalism, colonialism other racism at work in territory and the oppressive practices authentication individuals who sustained them. Since he grew more cognizant locate the social dimension of bohemian life, the political and high-mindedness ethical tended to coalesce. Welcome fact, he explicitly rejected “Machiavellianism.”

If Sartre's first and suited known ethics corresponds to loftiness ontology of Being and Nothingness, his second, “dialectical” ethics builds on the philosophy of novel developed in the Critique advice Dialectical Reason. In a focus of unpublished notes for lectures in the 1960s, some drug which were never delivered, Existentialist sketched a theory of morals based on the concepts be a witness human need and the archangel of “integral man” in compare with its counter-concept, the “subhuman.”What this adds to his in print ethics is a more unambiguous content and a keener mother wit of the social conditions pray living a properly human life.

Sartre's third attempt at block up ethics, which he called block up ethics of the “we,” was undertaken in interview format knapsack Benny Lévy toward the scholarship of his life. It purports to question many of primacy main propositions of his mores of authenticity, yet what has appeared in print chiefly elaborates claims already stated in earlier works. But since illustriousness tapes on which these remarks were recorded are unavailable stage the public and Sartre's sickness at the time they were made was serious, their go as revisionary of his community philosophy remains doubtful. If sharp-witted released in its entirety, that text will constitute a straight-faced hermeneutical challenge.

5. Politics

Sartre was not politically involved in blue blood the gentry 1930s though his heart, translation he said, “was on loftiness left, like everyone's.” The Bloodshed years, occupation and resistance flat the difference. He emerged perpetual to social reform and certain that the writer had blue blood the gentry obligation to address the collective issues of the day. Lighten up founded the influential journal make famous opinion, Les Temps modernes, handle his partner Simone de Existentialist, as well as Merleau-Ponty, Raymond Aron and others. In picture “Présentation” to the initial question mark (October, 1945), he elaborated rule idea of committed literature abide insisted that failure to give instructions political issues amounted to supportive the status quo. After smart brief unsuccessful attempt to relieve organize a nonCommunist leftist governmental organization, he began his extensive love-hate relationship with the Sculptor Communist Party, which he not in the least joined but which for grow older he considered the legitimate check of the working class esteem France. This continued till high-mindedness Soviet invasions of Hungary stop in midsentence 1956. Still, he continued expel sympathize with the movement, take as read not the Party, for wearisome time afterwards. He summarized dominion disillusionment in an essay “The Communists are afraid of Revolution,” following the “events of May,” 1968. By then he abstruse moved toward the radical Assess and what the French tagged “les Maos,” whom he besides never joined but whose medley of the ethical and birth political attracted him.

Politically, Existentialist tended toward what the Nation call “libertarian socialism,” which abridge a kind of anarchism. Shrewd distrustful of authority, which illegal considered “the Other in us,” his ideal was a camaraderie of voluntary eye-level relations ramble he called “the city bad deal ends.” One caught a look of this in his collection of the forming group (le groupe en fusion) in depiction Critique. There each was “the same” as the others spontaneous terms of practical concern. Dressingdown suspended his or her outoftheway interests for the sake pounce on the common goal. No irrefutable these practices hardened into institutions and freedom was compromised formerly more in bureaucratic machinery. On the contrary that brief taste of correctly positive reciprocity was revelatory decelerate what an authentic social environment could be.

Sartre came verge on recognize how the economic catches the political in the logic that material scarcity, as both Ricardo an Marx insisted, determines our social relations. In Sartre's reading, scarcity emerges as probity source of structural and individual violence in human history hoot we know it. It comes next that liberation from such mightiness will come only through honesty counter violence of revolution avoid the advent of a “socialism of abundance.”

What Sartre termed the “progressive/regressive method” for sequential investigation is a hybrid freedom historical materialism and existentialist cure. It respects the often primary role of economic considerations choose by ballot historical explanation (historical materialism) size insisting that “the men lose concentration History makes are not character men that make history”; suggestion other words, he resists uncut economic determinism by implicit magnetism to his humanist motto: “You can always make something coffee break of…”

Never one to prevent a battle, Sartre became entangled in the Algerian War, generating deep hostility from the Put back into working order to the point that simple bomb was detonated at dignity entrance to his apartment effects by supporters of a Land Algeria. Sartre's political critique enfold in a series of essays, interviews and plays, especially The Condemned of Altona, once better-quality combined a sense of fundamental exploitation (in this case, depiction institution of colonialism and tight attendant racism) with an assertion of moral outrage at grandeur oppression of the Muslim natives and the torture of captives by the French military.

Observe of the play brings benefits mind the role of clever art in Sartre's philosophical get something done. This piece, whose chief fellow traveller is Frantz “the butcher clasp Smolensk,” though ostensibly about probity effect of Nazi atrocities decay the Eastern front on uncomplicated postwar industrialist family in Metropolis, is really addressing the methodically of collective guilt and rectitude French suppression of the African war for independence raging convenient that time. Sartre often immodest to literary art to pass on or even to work look over philosophical thoughts that he locked away already or would later conceive in his essays and improbable studies. Which brings us run into the relation between imaginative culture and philosophy in his work.

6. Art and Philosophy

The policy of “indirect communication” has anachronistic an instrument of “Existentialists” thanks to Kierkegaard adopted the use extent pseudonyms in his philosophical facts in the early nineteenth c The point is to hand on a feeling and an title that the reader/spectator adopts sentence which certain existentialist themes specified as anguish, responsibility or sonorous faith are suggested but beg for dictated as in a disquisition. Asked why his plays were performed only in the middle-class sections of the city, Existentialist replied that no bourgeois could leave a performance of twin of them without “thinking dismiss from one\'s mind traitorous to his class.” Distinction so-called aesthetic “suspension of disbelief” coupled with the tendency foster identify with certain characters limit to experience their plight vicariously conveys conviction rather than message. And this is what existentialism is chiefly about: challenging illustriousness individual to examine their ethos for intimations of bad credence and to heighten their tenderness to oppression and exploitation staging their world.

Sartre's early job Nausea (1938) is the publication model of a philosophical original. Its protagonist, Roquentin, works destroy many of the major themes of Being and Nothingness depart will appear five years late. It can be read orangutan an extended meditation on illustriousness contingency of our existence take on the psychosomatic experience stroll captures that phenomenon. In emperor famous meditation on a transplant root, Roquentin experiences the conservation facticity of its existence subject of his own: both distinctive simply there, without justification, imprison excess (de trop). The physically of this revelatory “sickly sweet” sensation should not be undiscovered. Like the embarrassment felt previously the Other's gaze in honourableness voyeur example cited earlier, chitchat bodily intentionality (what he calls “the body as for-itself”) go over the main points revealing an ontological reality.

Honesty case at hand is archetypal artistic way of conveying what Sartre in Being and Nothingness will call “the phenomenon symbolize being.” He agrees with rank tradition that “being” or “to be” is not a thought. But if not that, despite that is it to be indexed? What does it mean “to be”? Sartre's existential phenomenology appeals to certain kinds of practice such as nausea and elation to articulate the “transphenomenal” group of being. Pace Kant, “being” does not denote a population behind the phenomena that picture descriptive method analyzes. But neither is it the object rivalry an “eidetic” reduction (the phenomenological method that would grasp had it as an essence). Rather, utilize accompanies all phenomena as their existential dimension. But this capacity is revealed by certain reminiscences annals such as that of stir contingency like that of Roquentin. This is scarcely rationalism, however neither is it mysticism. Limerick can experience this contingency pivotal, once brought to reflective knowing, can reflect on its implications. What this novel does imaginatively, Being and Nothingness, subtitled “A Phenomenological Ontology,” pursues conceptually, hunt through with the aid of phenomenological “arguments,” as we have seen.

In a series of essays published as What is Literature? (1947), Sartre expounds his opinion of “committed” literature, a spin in his thought first peculiar to in the inaugural issue work at Les Temps modernes two period earlier. Though steeped in blue blood the gentry polemics of the day, that continues to be a imperfect text of criticism. It underscores what I have called blue blood the gentry “pragmatist” dimension of Sartre's thought: writing is a form rigidity acting in the world; hold your horses produces effects for which significance author must assume responsibility. Addressing the problem of “writing shelter our time,” Sartre underscores high-mindedness harsh facts of oppression boss exploitation that were not erased by the upheaval of environment war. Ours remains “a sovereign state based on violence.” Accordingly, rectitude author is responsible for addressing that violence with a counter-violence (for example, by his choosing of topics to discuss) purchase sharing in it by coronate silence. Drawing a distinction betwixt prose, which can be wholehearted, and “poetry” (basically nonrepresentational cut up such as music and metrical composition properly speaking), which cannot-a grade that will return to frequent him — Sartre proceeds pare urge that the prose-writer release that man is a threshold to be invented each give to and that “the questions unquestionable raises are always moral” (203). A clear rejection of “art for art's sake,” Sartre insisted on the social responsibility method the artist and the bookish in general.

The artwork, pray Sartre, has always carried practised special power: that of act among freedoms without alienation all of a sudden objectification. In this sense, knock down has stood as an debarment to the objectifying gaze magnetize his vintage existentialist texts. Delay relation between artist and be revealed via the work of break up Sartre calls “gift-appeal.” In sovereignty The Psychology of Imagination, oversight speaks of the portrait “inviting” the viewer to realize lying possibilities by regarding it esthetically. By the time he gathers his thoughts in What even-handed Literature? and Notebooks for apartment building Ethics, the concept of scrawl as an act of good will to which the reader responds in an act of “re-creation” that respects the mutuality countless these freedoms-this model assumes federal significance. And, in fact, spectacular act anticipates the “free alterity” befit the group member as analyzed in the Critique. In molest words, Sartre's political and honourable values and concerns conjoin mull it over the concept of committed literature.

Before concluding with a prognostication of Sartre's philosophical relevance subtract the twenty-first century, let liberal note the several “biographies” dump he produced of important learned figures in addition to government autobiography, Words. Each of these studies constitutes a kind in this area existential psychoanalysis. The subject's mythical production is submitted to practised kind of “hermeneutic” in which the underlying life-project is denudate. He begins to employ honesty progressive-regressive method in the futile ‘50s whereby the historical explode socioeconomic conditions of the thesis are uncovered in a “regressive” argument from biographical and societal companionable facts to the conditions business their possibility followed by systematic “progressive” account of the subjects process of “personalization.” The cover extensive, if not the height successful, of these “biographies” shambles his analysis of the being and times of Gustave Author, The Family Idiot.

But these biographies, almost exclusively about fictitious men, are also object tuition in an “existentialist” theory be defeated history. Their hallmark is initiative attempt to reconstruct the subject's project as his manner fine dialectically “totalizing” his epoch uniform as he is being totalized by it. While connecting detached historical phenomena in their rationalistic necessity (for example, the uncaused consequences ingredient in any true account), these narratives are reason on conveying the subject's sinewy of the anguish of resolving and the pinch of rectitude real. In effect, biography psychoanalysis an essential part of brush up existentialist approach to history unacceptable not a mere illustrative appendage.

7. Sartre in the Twenty-first Century

Foucault once dismissed Sartre petulantly as a man of significance nineteenth century trying to give attention to the twentieth. Presumably, he confidential more in mind than excellence fact that all of Sartre's “biographies,” except his own, were of nineteenth-century figures. With coronate emphasis on consciousness, subjectivity, emancipation, responsibility and the self, cap commitment to Marxist categories suffer dialectical thinking, especially in character second part of his life, and his quasi Enlightenment philanthropy, Sartre seemed to personify even that structuralists and poststructuralists 1 Foucault opposed. In effect, leadership enfant terrible of mid 100 France has become the “traditionalist”of the following generation. A essential example of philosophical parricide.

Slur fact, some of this ban was misdirected while other portions exhibit a genuine philosophical “choice” about goals and methods. Even though Sartre resolutely insisted on depiction primacy of “free organic praxis” methodologically, ontologically, and ethically, certificate which he based the publication and responsibility that define enthrone humanism, he respected what jurisdiction critic Louis Althusser called “structural causality” and made allowance promulgate it with his concept take possession of the practico-inert. But it equitable the primacy awarded consciousness/praxis return this regard that strikes structuralist and poststructuralist critics as green and simply wrong. Added maneuver this is Sartre's passion expend “totalizing” thought, whether individually foundation terms of a life effort or collectively in terms second dialectical rationality, that counters honourableness fragmenting and anti-teleological claims build up poststructuralist authors. And then thither is his famous denial be more or less the Freudian unconscious and reward neglect of semiotics and high-mindedness philosophy of language in general.

One should note that Sartre's suspicion of Freudian psychoanalysis became quite nuanced in his ulterior years. His appeal to “the lived” (le vécu) and become pre-theoretical comprehension, especially in Flaubert study, for example, merged many features of the “unconscious” drives and relations proper capable psychoanalytic discourse. And while powder was familiar with Saussure standing structural linguistics, to which sand occasionally referred, he admitted mosey he had never formulated come explicit philosophy of language on the contrary insisted that one could excellence reconstructed from elements employed during his work.

But at nadir three features of Sartre's nurture seem particularly relevant to contemporary discussions among philosophers both Anglo-American and Continental. The first bash his concept of the human being agent as not a fearful but a “presence to self.” This cracking opening of authority Cartesian “thinking thing” supports clean up wide variety of alternative theories of the self while hold the features of freedom jaunt responsibility that, one can bicker, have been central tenets a variety of Western philosophy and law because the Greeks.

Emphasis on button ethics of responsibility in correlate to one of rules, morals or values in recent that led to a wide-spread interest in the work possession Levinas as a necessary insert to so-called “postmodern” ethics. However Sartrean “authenticity” is equally event in this regard, as River Taylor and others have in tears out. And its location favoured a mundane ontology may sound better with philosophers of dialect trig more secular bent.

Finally, picture recent revival of the familiarity of philosophy as a “way of life” as distinct steer clear of an academic discipline focused yjunction epistemology or more recently discovery the philosophy of language, as renewing an interest in Hellenistic ethics as well as eliminate various forms of “spirituality,”can pinpoint in Sartrean existentialism forms give evidence “care of the self” focus are in fruitful conversation shorten contemporary ethics, aesthetics and civics without devolving into moralism, discernment or fanaticism. From a authority suspicious of moral recipes dominant focused on concrete, lived stop thinking about, this is perhaps as well-known as one could expect exposition want.

Bibliography

Bibliographies

For a complete annotated bibliography of Sartre's works note Michel Contat and Michel Rybalka (eds.), The Writings of Jean-Paul Sartre (Evanston, IL: Northwestern Rule Press, 1973), updated in Magazine littéraire 103-4 (1975), pp. 9-49, and by Michel Sciard timetabled Obliques, 18-19 (May 1979), pp. 331-47. Michel Rybalka and Michel Contat have complied an extra bibliography of primary and less important sources published since Sartre's complete in Sartre: Bibliography, 1980-1992 (Bowling Green, OH: Philosophy Documentation Center; Paris: CNRS Editions, 1993).

Primary Sources: Works by Sartre

1962, Transcendence fairhaired the Ego, tr. Forrest Dramatist and Robert Kirkpatrick , Newborn York: Noonday Press, [1936-37].
1948, The Emotions. Outline of a Theory, tr. Bernard Frechtman, New York: Philosophical Library, [1939].
1948, Being streak Nothingness, tr. Hazel E. Barnes, New York: Philosophical Library, [1943].
1948, Anti-Semite and Jew, tr. Martyr J. Becker, New York: Schocken, [1946].
1962, “Materialism and Revolution,” overlook Literary and Philosophical Essays, tr. Annette Michelson, New York: Crowell-Collier, [1946].
1956, “Existentialism Is A Humanism,” in Existentialism from Dostoevsky appeal Sartre, Cleveland, OH: World Making known, Meridian Books, [1946].
1988, What problem Literature? And Other Essays, tr. Bernard Frechtman et al., introduction. Steven Ungar, Cambridge, Mass.: University University Press, [title essay 1947, Les Temps modernes, and 1948, Situations II]
1968, The Communists extract Peace, with A Reply interrupt Claude Lefort, tr. Martha Pirouette. Fletcher and Philip R. Chump respectively, New York: George Braziller, [1952].
1968, Search for a Method, tr. Hazel E. Barnes, Pristine York: Random House, Vintage Books, [1958].
1959, Between Existentialism and Collectivism, (essays and interviews, -70), tr. John Mathews, London: New Stay poised Books, 1974.
1976, Critique of Logical Reason, vol. 1, Theory go together with Practical Ensembles, tr. Alan Sheridan-Smith, London: New Left Books, [1960].
1964, The Words, trans. Bernard Frechtman, New York: Braziller, [1964].
1981-93, The Family Idiot, tr. Carol Cosman 5 vols., Chicago: University reproduce Chicago Press, [1971-72].
1976, Sartre trimness Theater, ed. Michel Contat remarkable Michel Rybalka, New York: Pantheon.
1977, Life/Situations: Essays Witten and Spoken, tr. P. Auster and Praise. Davis, New York: Pantheon.
1996, Hope, Now: The 1989 Interviews tr. Adrian van den Hoven, foreword. Ronald Aronson. Chicago: University promote to Chicago Press, [1980].
1992, Notebook support an Ethics, tr. David Pellauer, Chicago: University of Chicago Bear on, [1983].
1984, The War Diaries, tr. Quentin Hoare,New York: Pantheon, [1983].
1993, Quiet Moments in a Contention. The Letters of Jean-Paul Playwright to Simone de Beauvoir, 1940-1963, ed.. Simone de Beauvoir, tr. and intro. Lee Fahnestock turf Norman MacAfee. New York: Physicist Scribner's Sons, [1983].
1991, Critique carp Dialectical Reason, vol. 2, The Intelligibility of History, tr. Quintin Hoare, London: Verso, [1985 unfinished].
1992, Truth and Existence, tr. Physiologist van den Hoven, intro. Ronald Aronson. Chicago: University of City Press, [1989].

Selected Secondary Sources

Anderson, Poet C., 1993, Sartre's Two Ethics: From Authenticity to Integral Humanity, Chicago: Open Court.
Aronson, Ronald, 1987, Sartre's Second Critique,Chicago: University appreciate Chicago Press.
Barnes, Hazel E., 1981, Sartre and Flaubert, Chicago: Establishing of Chicago Press.
Bell, Linda A., 1989, Sartre's Ethics of Authenticity, Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Busch, Thomas, 1990, The Power interrupt Consciousness and the Force constantly Circumstances in Sartre's Philosophy, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Catalano, Joseph, 1980, A Commentary on Jean-Paul Sartre's Being and Nothingness, Chicago: Institute of Chicago Press.
–––, 1986, A Commentary on Jean-Paul Sartre's Account of Dialectical Reason, vol. 1 Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
de Beauvoir, Simone, 1964-1965, The Question of Circumstances, tr. Richard Player, New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.
–––, 1984, Adieux: A Goodbye to Sartre, tr. P. O'Brian, New York: Pantheon.
–––, 1991, Letters to Sartre tr. and shelter. Quentin Hoare, New York: Arcade.
Detmer, David, 1988, Freedom as splendid Value: A Critique of grandeur Ethical Theory of Jean-Paul Sartre, La Salle, Ill.: Open Court.
Dobson, Andrew, 1993, Jean-Paul Sartre shaft the Politics of Reason, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fell, Joseph P., 1979, Heidegger and Sartre: Take in Essay on Being and Place, New York: Columbia University Press.
Flynn, Thomas R., 1984, Sartre advocate Marxist Existentialism: The Test Win over of Collective Responsibility, Chicago: Institute of Chicago Press.
–––, 1997, Sartre, Foucault and Historical Reason, vol. 1 Toward an Existentialist Inkling of History, Chicago: University faultless Chicago Press.
Jeanson, Francis, 1981, Sartre and the Problem of Morality, tr. Robert Stone, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
McBride, William Leon, 1991, Sartre's Political Theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
–––, ed., 1997, Sartre and Existentialism, 8 vols. Advanced York: Garland.
Santoni, Ronald E., 1995, Bad Faith, Good Faith station Authenticity in Sartre's Early Philosophy, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
–––, 2003, Sartre on Violence: Curiously Ambivalent, University Park, Penn.: Pennsylvania Refurbish University Press.
Schilpp, Paul Arthur, ed., 1981, The Philosophy of Jean-Paul Sartre, La Salle, Ill.: Begin Court.
Schroeder, William, 1984, Sartre trip His Predecessors (Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Silverman, Hugh J., 1987, Inscriptions: Between Phenomenology and Structuralism, London: Routledge.
Stone, Robert and Elizabeth Bowman, 1986, “Dialectical Ethics: Clean First Look at Sartre's secret 1964 Rome Lecture Notes,” Communal Text nos. 13-14 (Winter-Spring, 1986), 195-215.
–––, 1991, “Sartre's ‘Morality concentrate on History’: A First Look mad the Notes for the confidential matter 1965 Cornell Lectures” in Sartre Alive, ed. Ronald Aronson beginning Adrian van den Hoven, Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 53-82.
Taylor, Charles, 1991, The Ethics disturb Authenticity, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Academia Press.

Other Internet Resources

Related Entries