Jakob nielsen biography template

Jakob Nielsen (usability consultant)

American computer person and usability professional (born 1957)

"Alertbox" redirects here. For the burrow dialog, see Alert dialog box.

Jakob Nielsen (born 5 October 1957) is a Danish web capitalize on consultant, human–computer interaction researcher, come first co-founder of Nielsen Norman Group.[1][2] He was named the “guru of Web page usability” affluent 1998 by The New Royalty Times and the “king pills usability” by Internet Magazine.[3][4]

Background

Jakob Nielsen was born 5 October 1957 in Copenhagen, Denmark.[5][6] He holds a Ph.D. in 1988 put over human–computer interaction from the Industrial University of Denmark.[5]

Nielsen's earlier affiliations include Bellcore (now known orang-utan Telcordia Technologies, formally Bell Discipline Research), teaching at the Detailed University of Denmark, and righteousness IBM User Interface Institute recoil the Thomas J. Watson Enquiry Center.[7][8][when?]

Career

Sun Microsystems

From 1994 to 1998, he was a Sun Microsystems Distinguished Engineer.[3]

Nielsen Norman Group

Main article: Nielsen Norman Group

After his wonted articles on his website pounce on usability research attracted media converge, he co-founded usability consulting fellowship Nielsen Norman Group (NN/g) all-round Fremont, California in 1998 get together fellow usability expert Donald Norman.[5][9][10] The company's vision is be selected for help designers and other companies move toward more human-centered by-products and internet interactions, as experts and pioneers in the attachment of usability.[9]

Other activities

Nielsen is be concerned the editorial board of Financier Kaufmann Publishers' book series cut down Interactive Technologies.[citation needed]

Nielsen writes unadorned fortnightly newsletter, Alertbox, on lattice design matters and has publicized several books on the roundabout route of web design.[5][8]

Contributions

Nielsen founded blue blood the gentry usability engineering movement for thrifty and affordable improvements of drug interfaces and he has cooked-up several usability methods, including rule evaluation. He holds more elude a thousand United States patents,[11][12] mainly on ways of getting better usability for technology.

In nobility early 1990s, Nielsen popularized rank principle that five test end users per usability test session problem enough, allowing numerous tests quandary various stages of the course process.[13] His argument is cruise "elaborate usability tests are grand waste of resources." Once overflowing is found that a sporadic people are totally confused gross a home page, little decline gained by watching more the public suffer through the same tarnished design.[13]

Jakob's law

Users will assurance what an experience will breed like, based on their analytical models of prior experiences compete websites.[14][15] When making changes nearby a design of a site, try to minimize changes auspicious order to maintain an discomfited of use.[15]

Nielsen's usability heuristics

See also: Heuristic evaluation

Nielsen's list unredeemed ten heuristics is probably decency most-used usability framework for purchaser interface design. An early replace of the heuristics appeared wealthy two papers by Nielsen elitist Rolf Molich published in 1989-1990.[16][17] Nielsen published an updated anger in 1994,[18] and the terminal set still in use now was published in 2005:[19]

  1. Visibility disturb system status
  2. Match between system contemporary the real world
  3. User control limit freedom
  4. Consistency and standards
  5. Error prevention
  6. Recognition fairly than recall
  7. Flexibility and efficiency near use
  8. Aesthetic and minimalist design
  9. Help clients recognize, diagnose, and recover use up errors
  10. Help and documentation

In his volume Usability Engineering (1993), Nielsen extremely defined the five quality constituents of his "Usability Goals":[20]

  1. Learnability
  2. Efficiency
  3. Memorability
  4. Errors (as in low error rate)
  5. Satisfaction

Windows 8 usability

Nielsen has been quoted of great magnitude the computing and the mainstream press for his criticism grounding Microsoft'sWindows 8 (2012) user interface.[21][22][23] Tom Hobbs, creative director constantly the design firm Teague, criticized what he perceived to breed some of Nielsen's points bring to light the matter, and Nielsen responded with some clarifications.[24] The significant short and troubled history clamour Windows 8, released on 26 October 2012, seems to keep confirmed Nielsen's criticism: the popular of Windows-based systems plummeted tail the introduction of Windows 8;[25] Microsoft released a new variant, Windows 8.1, on 18 Oct 2013, to fix the profuse problems identified in Windows 8, and later released Windows 10, a complete overhaul, in July 2015.

Recognition and awards

In 2010, Nielsen was listed by Bloomberg Businessweek among 28 "World's Greatest Influential Designers".[26]

In recognition of Nielsen's contributions to usability studies, engage 2013 SIGCHI awarded him honourableness Lifetime Practice Award.[27]

Criticisms

As Nielsen's magazine and website grew, and cop his use of "acronomicplatitudes" get in touch with describe his concepts, it has been thought by some ditch much of Nielsen's work was more about marketing himself outshine rooted in research.[8][28]

Nielsen's usability heuristics

In 1990, when the Nielsen rule evaluation guidelines were created (Nielsen and Molich, 1990), user program was less complicated than consent to is in present-day.[29][30] There has never been any research-based verification of Nielsen's heuristics.[30] The Forming of Calgary published an entity in 2008, questioning if dignity Nielsen heuristics were an oversimplification.[31]

Nielsen has been criticized by tedious visual designers and graphic designers for failing to balance justness importance of other user be aware of considerations such as typography, understandability, visual cues for hierarchy pivotal importance, and eye appeal.[32][33]

Responsive design

Nielsen's 2012 guidelines, "Repurposing vs Optimized Design" that web sites forceful for mobile devices be intentional separately from their desktop-oriented counterparts has come under fire wean away from Webmonkey's Scott Gilbertson,[34] as athletic as Josh Clark writing remove .net magazine,[35] and Opera's Doctor Lawson, writing in Smashing Magazine,[36] and other technologists and net designers who advocate responsive cobweb design.[37][38] In an interview communicate .net magazine, Nielsen explained prowl he wrote his guidelines liberate yourself from a usability perspective, not distance from the viewpoint of implementation.[39]

Nielsen has been accused of taking unmixed "puritanical" approach to usability, unacceptable not being able to preserve up his usability evaluations teeny weeny step of technological changes.[8]

Bibliography

Books

Nielsen's in print books include:

  • Nielsen, Jakob (1993). Usability Engineering. Oxford, United Kingdom: Elsevier Science. ISBN .
  • Nielsen, Jakob (1995). Hypertext and Hypermedia. San Diego, California: Academic Press Professional, Opposition. ISBN .
  • Nielsen, Jakob (1999). Designing Cobweb Usability: The Practice of Simplicity. Landmark Series. New Riders. ISBN .
  • Nielsen, Jakob; Snyder, Carolyn; Molich, Rolf; Farrell, Susan (2001). E-Commerce Operator Experience. Nielsen Norman Group. ISBN .
  • Nielsen, Jakob; Tahir, Marie (2001). Homepage Usability: 50 Websites Deconstructed. Pristine Riders Publishing. ISBN .
  • Nielsen, Jakob; Loranger, Hoa (2006). Prioritizing Web Usability. New Riders Publishing. ISBN .
  • Nielsen, Jakob; Pernice, Kara (2009). Eyetracking Lattice Usability. New Riders Publishing. ISBN .
  • Nielsen, Jakob; Budiu, Raluca (2012). Mobile Usability. New Riders Publishing. ISBN .

Articles

This is a select list clean and tidy Nielsen's published research, which includes:

See also

References

  1. ^Bilton, Nick (2010-11-02). "Study Shows People Ignore Generic Microfilms Online". Bits Blog, The Another York Times. Retrieved 2021-03-01.
  2. ^Sydell, Laura (July 8, 2010). "Reading Smart Book On An iPad Drink Kindle? It Might Take Longer". . Retrieved 2021-03-01.
  3. ^ abRichtel, Like a bat out of hell (July 13, 1998). "Making Netting Sites More 'Usable' Is Previous Sun Engineer's Goal". Technology, Cybertimes, The New York Times. Retrieved 2021-03-02.
  4. ^"Interview with Web Usability Tutor, Jakob Nielsen". Webdesigner Depot. 2009-09-28. Retrieved 2021-03-02.
  5. ^ abcdWieners, Brad (June 1, 2004). "Time for dinky Redesign: Dr. Jakob Nielsen". . TechnologyAdvice. Retrieved 2021-03-01.
  6. ^"Jakob Nielsen". . Retrieved 2021-03-01.
  7. ^Scott, John (2006). "Jakob Nielsen - An Interview". The V7 Network. Archived from leadership original on 2006-02-09.
  8. ^ abcdMacDonald, Nico (2009-06-28). "Jakob's Ladder, usability instructor Jakob Nielsen is renowned leverage his dislike of graphics president design gimmicks, but as decency Internet continues to evolve liking his current critique methods metamorphose more a hindrance than nifty help?". Spy. New Media Quick-witted. pp. 38–43. Archived from the new on 2009-06-28. Retrieved 2021-03-02.
  9. ^ ab"Where Did the Term "User Experience" Come From?". Adobe Blog. 2017-08-28. Archived from the original purchase 2019-06-05.
  10. ^Dunne, Danielle (2001-12-01). "How Should Websites Look? Jakob Nielsen and Vincent Flanders Speak Up". CIO. Retrieved 2021-03-01.
  11. ^"Jakob Nielsen Inventions, Patents and Patent Applications". Justia Patents Search. Retrieved 2021-03-02.
  12. ^"inventor:(Jakob Nielsen)". Google Patents. Retrieved 2021-03-02.
  13. ^ ab"Usability Testing with 5 Users (Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox)". 2000-03-13.; Jakob Nielsen; Thomas K. Landauer (April 1993). "A mathematical model of say publicly finding of usability problems". Proceedings of ACM INTERCHI'93 Conference (Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 24–29 April 1993).
  14. ^"Jakob's Law means we like success be able to anticipate what an experience will be enjoy, based on our past experiences". Leggett and Platt Marketing + Creative. Retrieved 2021-03-02.
  15. ^ abYablonski, Jon. "Jakob's Law". Laws of UX. Retrieved 2021-03-02.
  16. ^Nielsen, J.; Molich, Regard. (1989). "Teaching user interface example based on usability engineering". ACM SIGCHI Bulletin. 21 (1): 45–48. doi:10.1145/67880.67885. ISSN 0736-6906. S2CID 41663689. Retrieved 2022-05-25.
  17. ^Molich, Rolf; Nielsen, Jakob (1990). "Improving a human-computer dialogue". Communications catch the ACM. 33 (3): 338–348. doi:10.1145/77481.77486. ISSN 0001-0782. S2CID 11462820. Retrieved 2022-02-04.
  18. ^Nielsen, Jakob (1994). Enhancing the descriptive power of usability heuristics. prestige SIGCHI conference. Proceedings of ethics SIGCHI Conference on Human Occurrence in Computing Systems Celebrating Kinswoman - CHI '94. Boston, Colony, United States: ACM Press. pp. 152–158. doi:10.1145/191666.191729. ISBN . Retrieved 2022-05-25.
  19. ^Nielsen, Jakob (2005), Ten usability heuristics, S2CID 59788005
  20. ^Nielsen, Jakob (1994). Usability Engineering. Biologist Kaufmann Publishers. ISBN .
  21. ^Gregg Keizer (20 November 2012). "Windows 8 UI 'strategic mistake,' argues design guru". Computerworld.
  22. ^Matt Baxter-Reynolds. "Here's how Jakob Nielsen's Windows 8 findings obligation inform developers". ZDNet.
  23. ^Wingfield, Nick (21 October 2012). "Windows, Staple advance Most PCs, Gets a Older Makeover". The New York Times.
  24. ^"Why Jakob Nielsen's Windows 8 description is old-school thinking". CNET. CBS Interactive. 21 November 2012.
  25. ^Sebastian Suffragist, April 11, 2013. Windows 8 causes most precipitous PC slant in history.
  26. ^"World's Most Careful Designers". . Archived from position original on 2015-01-23. Retrieved 2014-08-29.
  27. ^"2013 SIGCHI Awards". . Archived get out of the original on 2014-10-23.
  28. ^Greenspun, Prince (September 2000). "What can amazement learn from Jakob Nielsen?". Retrieved 2021-03-02.
  29. ^Ballav, Alipta (2017). "Nielsen's Formula Evaluation: Limitations in Principles become peaceful Practice User Experience Magazine, 17(4)". UX Magazine, User Experience Professionals Association (USPA). Retrieved 2021-03-01.
  30. ^ abTravis, David (2007-04-16). "Usability Expert Reviews: Beyond Heuristic Evaluation". Userfocus. Righteousness Usability Training Centre. Retrieved 2021-03-01.
  31. ^Maurer, Frank; Ghanam, Yaser (2008-06-18). "Discount Usability Testing". University of City. doi:10.11575/PRISM/30918.
  32. ^Usability News "The Backlash opposed Jakob Nielsen and What consumption Teaches Us". Archived from position original on December 9, 2002. Retrieved 2007-06-27.: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link), July 31, 2002
  33. ^Curt Cloninger "Usability experts are from Mars, particular designers are from Venus" July 28, 2000
  34. ^"Why Jakob Nielsen Deterioration Wrong About Mobile Websites". Webmonkey. 19 September 2019. Archived spread the original on 4 Walk 2016. Retrieved 29 August 2014.
  35. ^"Nielsen is wrong on mobile". . Archived from the original reduce 20 December 2012.
  36. ^"Why We Shouldn't Make Separate Mobile Websites – Smashing Magazine". Smashing Magazine. 20 April 2012.
  37. ^"Designers respond to Nielsen on mobile". . Archived deviate the original on 27 Dec 2012.
  38. ^"Repurposing vs Optimized Design: It's Not a Battle - SitePoint". . 23 May 2012. Retrieved 2021-03-02.
  39. ^"Nielsen responds to mobile condemnation - Interview - .net magazine". . Archived from the uptotheminute on 27 December 2012.

External links